10 Comments
Jul 27·edited Jul 27Liked by Harrison Koehli

"By conceiving of the national security in this way, you end up engaging in behaviors that arguably also threaten the national security. For one, you make people distrust or even hate you."

What if that’s the point? Not to get them to hate "you", exactly (for you yourself are shrouded in secrecy). But to hate and mistrust what you mistakenlyj see as the power structure of your nation, and maybe of nations in general.

Expand full comment

I would guess that this is indeed a part of what is going on. Our sense of our connection to trusted human institutions is being attacked.

Expand full comment
Jul 27Liked by Harrison Koehli

I have also been interested in how all this came to be.

According to my Wikipedia-level understanding of the subject of "state secrets," this did not really become a national issue until a little before World War 1 in the UK and a little after that in the U.S. And document classification did not become a big thing in the U.S. until 1951.

That puts us squarely after the Roswell incident in the U.S. However, the government was very successful at keeping the Manhattan Project a secret between 1942 and when the bombs were dropped on Japan.

Some think that Roswell and various related contacts with "ET" were triggered by our use of atomic weapons. In any case, when ET became a real thing for our government, a need to have a formal structure to keep it a secret seemed obvious at the time.

I don't have a lot more data from that time period. But I think it is clear that if the reality of ET were to be revealed, a large amount of government and corporate blab and posturing would be widely seen as deceitful. There was no one there pushing for a more mature and honest approach to the whole problem. If Kennedy knew about it and wanted to do something in that direction, that would have been a good excuse to have him killed. But I don't know the facts in that regard.

I know that by 1952, Hubbard's research had made it clear to him that ET was real. And at about that time, he began to be pounded for being a madman. Up to then he had been a reputable and popular story writer and adventurer.

To the extent that this ties in with "secret power groups" is unclear to me. But Courtney Brown has found evidence that ET directly monitors and influences many world leaders. What are the full and exact results of this influence?

I suppose that the development of a "psychopathic" form of Public Relations was inevitable. But to what extent was this pushed along by the shocking reality of ET? Public Relations as a subject has always existed, but not really written about until the early 1900s. The corporate world was slowly but surely gaining a prominence and dominance in the lives and economies of the people of Earth, and they needed PR to assist them in this project.

Hubbard himself wrote extensively about the importance of PR. He however warned that dishonesty in PR would ultimately lead to its failure. Once a compulsive liar is exposed, he is never trusted again.

Or is he? It doesn't help that society seems to have a short memory for most transgressions, except for the ones that someone constantly reminds us of. Thus, for example, we have one group - being constantly reminded of Income Tax, the JFK assassination and various other deceptions - that is convinced that the federal government is a "swamp" that must be "drained." While another group, constantly reminded of the racial and class transgressions of various local power groups - including police - that is totally convinced that we need a strong federal government to protect our civil rights by reining in corrupt local officials.

I just tonight saw a program on PBS about the "Divided We Fall" project which seems to have been put together by some marketing / public opinion people interested in "group psychology." It was cute and entertaining in many ways, but basically pablum. In this concept of human psychology, one's "truth" is totally defined by "lived experience." And that does NOT seem to include scholarly activities or serious study of subjects.

While I agree that most people "feel" their way through life because they don't really have the resources to take a more intellectual approach, this cannot be our ultimate fate or we are doomed. If I did not study, not only would I know nothing about physics, electronics, biology or the theory of evolution, but I would also know nothing about Spirit, actual human psychology and the full range of potential human abilities, or the theory of Intelligent Design.

We are given the impression that all we have time for is watching TV, and our information resources do not extend much beyond entertainment, news and maybe YouTube. I can tell you that if a person stopped watching TV and YouTube and started reading real books, or their online or audio equivalents, and bothered to actually look up their misunderstood words, that they would become a "genius" by comparison to most of their zombie friends in a month or two. There is SO MUCH out there to study, and most people are totally unaware of it.

Thus we have the broadcast media. Before the Internet, we had TV. And before TV we had radio. And again we are back to the early 1900s. These were methods for both Corporate and other organized groups to consolidate their power and influence by creating an entertainment environment that was so captivating and - you could say, flattering - to the audience that it would capture the attention of the majority of the population, which would then fall under its control. The pesky problems of Democracy are thus sidestepped. Though psychopaths certainly played a role in all of this, I believe the responsibility for it must be accepted by a wider group. Psychopaths, after all, are incapable of being responsible.

Expand full comment
Jul 27Liked by Harrison Koehli

One thing that is new is that the psychopaths are so sure of their victory over humans that obviously a decision was made somewhere to stop even pretending to be humans (ie the latest Nike commercial singing an ode to psychopathy. As for "nudges" and other psyops that no one bothers to hide anymore, they do require whole teams with Dark Triade/Tetrade personality, for all those thing are Machiavellian at best. In an institution, it already requires psychopathy at high levels to make those decisions, ie the "takeover" by psychopathic individuals had already happened, from then on it's just filling in the vacancies with their kind and kicking out an odd human stranded there.

As for psychopathic methods of warfare, no, it was WWI, not WWII at least in the UK, with vivid interest from the US, see Arthur Pnsonby's Falehood in Wartime that is all over internet in public domain.

Expand full comment
Sep 17·edited Sep 17

Dr. Susan Michie, head of the UK SAGE Committee, and self-proclaimed Communist....now running Behavioural Science programs for WHO.

Expand full comment

Everyone is spying on everyone. We all know this🙄 National security is just a global circle jerk. Note, the US government hasn't searched any other Trump properties for the remaining missing classified documents. They might not be that important 🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment

"It is I who says who is a Jew or not" - Jospeph Goebbels.

"We are the Masterrace" - Menachim Begin

“Imagine North Korea in 2030, when every citizen has to wear a biometric bracelet 24 hours a day. If you listen to a speech by the Great Leader and the bracelet picks up the tell-tale signs of anger, you are done for.”- Klaus Schwab

3 of a kind

Holocaust Deniers History Cover Up

https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/holocaust-deniers-history-cover-up

Expand full comment
author

Fritz, please comment on how this is related to my post, otherwise it just looks like a self-promotion.

Expand full comment

National Security is undermined by people like above...

People in power who tell lies...

Like Harris Biden Hitler.

They lie to the public in order to create war.

At the same time they deny us the truth of where we come from who we are and the fruit of our labor by rising inflation through stirring up war.

Ukraine Hamas perfect examples.

There is no national security without the Truth.

Net Zero for example is a Lie because we have all the tools to make this world better.

Yet these people lie in our faces... these people are the problem.

So yes it relates to your post 100000%

And they all work for the WEF.

And the comment from Klaus Schwab shows us what their plan for the future is.

As long as we suck up to there lies there can be no national security.

These people are a danger to us.

Expand full comment